2019 © OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CLINICAL CENTER / 6712 BROOKLAWN PARKWAY, SUITE 204 / SYRACUSE / NY / 13211
PHONE: 315-432-8899 / FAX: 315-431-9528 / EMAIL: CNYOHCC@UPSTATE.EDU
WHY IS UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AN OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY AND HEALTH ISSUE?
Michael B. Lax MD MPH
3/26/18
The likelihood of these problems being fixed is virtually zero within the confines of the current WC system. The many forces
driving doctors in the community out of the WC system remain, while the system seems unable and/or unwilling to institute
countermeasures to keep physicians participating, let alone bring back practitioners who have already left. Meanwhile the abusive
behavior of the WC insurance carriers continues unabated with challenges to every aspect of care provided by physicians including:
diagnoses made, testing requested, and treatment recommended. Not only does this place a tremendous burden on the doctor and
her/his office, it also prevents the practice of high quality medicine. The Workers’ Compensation Board ( WCB) and legislature have
likewise failed to confront and curtail the powers of the insurance industry.
If they can’t be fixed then why bother writing about these problems? Because if we look beyond the confines of the existing
set-up there is a simple solution: universal public health care. A system such as Ontario’s single payer program resolves these issues.
The division of health care into two parallel systems, one for general health and one for work related health problems, is a
consequence of the US’ peculiar history. Workers’ Compensation systems were created in one state after the other in the decade or
so following the Triangle Shirtwaist fire in Manhattan in 1911. Labor and its allies had been arguing for some time for a system to
quickly and fairly provide medical care and compensation to injured workers as a replacement for workers having to sue their
employers. Workers filing suit occasionally won significant sums, but for the vast majority the process was extremely burdensome
and the barriers to winning a case made it very difficult for an injured worker to prevail. The sight of 146 bodies piled up near
blocked exits and on Greene and other surrounding streets after the Triangle Shirtwaist fire galvanized reformers and gave the
necessary push to pass Workers’ Compensation legislation. By the time general health insurance became widespread and often
employer based in the following decades, the Workers’ Compensation system was already well established.
Participation by physicians in WC is voluntary and a significant section of MDs has always chosen not to accept WC. In the
past their reasons have included: low reimbursement, delays in payment, excessive paperwork, and demands to testify in court. WC
underwent a significant reform in NY in 2007. As these changes were implemented incrementally over the next few years, many
more physicians exited the system. The perceived increased demands of the reforms were the straw that broke the camel’s back
and led many practitioners to declare “enough!”. As a result injured workers, especially outside the larger urban centers are
unable to find doctors to treat their work related condition. Even those with doctors who have been treating them under WC often
find themselves out in the cold as their physician informs them that s/he no longer will be accepting WC and will stop providing
their care.
A single payer universal health care system could address the problem of participation quite simply. Private health
insurance and WC insurance would be eliminated, to be replaced by a government entity that would be responsible for financing all
health care costs: a single payer. All patients would be covered for all health conditions. All health care providers would participate
and provide care to all without needing to concern themselves about the work relatedness of a health problem. The issues of WC
reimbursement rates, delays, paperwork, and court testimony become non-issues in a universal health care system, removing the
disincentives MDs face in under the current system.
Universal health care would also resolve the issue of poor quality care under WC as a consequence of insurance carrier
abuse. In a single payer system the rules of what is approved and reimbursed are the same, whether a condition is work related or
not. This is not to say the system is dispute or delay free, but there are far fewer than under the current system in the US. In
addition, there is only one level of care, in stark contrast to NY where the health care received under WC is subject to so many
challenges and barriers erected by the insurance carriers.
The resolution of these key issues with a universal single payer system is not just theoretical. Just across the border in
Ontario, for example, a single payer system has been in place for decades. There, injured workers have no problem finding a doctor
to get treatment. They do not have their testing or treatment delayed, interrupted, or blocked altogether by a WC insurance
carrier. Instead, the treatment they receive is the same any other resident would be provided, whether or not the condition is
work-related. Ontario and Canada is just one example of how the system has already proven itself. Many others could be found
across the developed world.
Advocacy for single payer universal health care in the United States has been going on for decades. There is a tendency for
politicians of both major parties to dismiss it as a possibility, Republicans mostly because they are opposed on ideological grounds
to what they call (inaccurately) ‘government’ based medicine, and Democrats because ‘it’s just not realistic’. In the current Trump
and Republican dominated administration it might seem like a pie in the sky goal. HOWEVER…popular energy in favor of universal
health care has arguably never been higher. Bernie Sanders’ campaign made the issue a central plank of its platform, generating
widespread support. He and many others continue to press for this kind of change. With popular support continuing to rise, the
deficiencies of the current market-based health care system becoming ever more obvious, and the lack of any credible Republican
alternative, there is legitimate reason for optimism for single payer.
In the meantime, the New York State Assembly, led by Assembly Health Committee chair Richard Gottfried, has succeeded
in passing the New York Health Act, legislation for the establishment of a single payer universal health plan for all New Yorkers, the
past three years. Every year support has increased in the Republican controlled state Senate and last year was just one cosponsor
short of majority support. In this context, it is no longer unrealistic to think that the New York Health Act could soon pass the New
York legislature. As it stands now, the bill does not include health care currently provided under Workers’ Compensation. Its
sponsors, however have expressed an openness to eventually wrapping WC into the system.
Passing the New York Health Act is a crucial step on the road to changing the WC system and providing for the medical
needs of injured workers. Health and safety advocates should see this as a top priority for our action agenda. And hopefully we can
convince other advocates for New York Health of the importance of including the WC piece as a necessary part of truly providing
universal health care in New York State.
Inclusion of medical care for injured workers in New York Health should, however, not let employers off the financial hook
for the responsibility they bear for working conditions causing worker injuries and illnesses. Injured workers and their families, and
taxpayers already pay a high proportion of the costs of occupational illness and injury. To avoid socializing what should be the
employers’ responsibility even further, New York Health should explore options for making sure employers pay their fair share, and
include an effective mechanism in the universal health care system to be created.
The following resources are useful for anyone seeking more information:
Campaign for New York Health
Focused on the campaign for universal single payer health care in NY state
http://www.nyhcampaign.org
Healthcare NOW
National coalition campaigning for federal single payer legislation and support for state plans
https://www.healthcare-now.org/about/
Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP)
National organization of physicians, medical students, and health care professionals advocating for single payer. Their site has a lot
of data on all aspects of the issue.
The PNHP Metro chapter has been supporting the campaign for New York Health
http://www.pnhp.org
http://www.pnhpnymetro.org
Bernie Sanders
This site describes his support for federal single payer legislation
https://berniesanders.com/medicareforall/
Workers injured or made ill on the job in New York state face major
problems accessing the health care they need. Among those
problems two stand out:
•
Locating a physician who accepts Workers’ Compensation (WC)
as payment
•
Workers Compensation insurance carriers deny payment for
medical care for all kinds of reasons, resulting in delays in
necessary testing and treatment that can last months or even
years
These fundamental problems undermine one of the ostensible
purposes of the Workers’ Compensation system: providing timely and
appropriate medical care to injured workers. As a consequence, health conditions often worsen or fail to improve, and can become
needlessly prolonged or even permanent. Careers can be unnecessarily curtailed, and the lack of ability to earn a living may be
devastating, condemning an injured worker and his/her family to impoverishment. Significant and long term mental health impacts
are frequent as another result.